Q&A With Professor Elizabeth Hillman

In May, Hillman was awarded a $1.66 million grant by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke to fund this research for the next five years. Hillman and her team of graduate students will build on their current system of optical imaging technologies—which includes camera-based imaging systems and laser-scanning tools—to make them faster and provide higher-resolution images when investigating the brain, and possibly other organs.
Hillman is also the inaugural recipient of The Rodriguez Family Junior Faculty Development Award, created by SEAS alumni Ana Rodriguez (SEAS'86, '88) and her brother, Marcos (SEAS'83), to support recruitment, retention and recognition of under-represented junior faculty. Hillman will use the fund toward her lab.
Q. What is it about your research that has not been done before?
We're investigating the brain as a machine, and then we're building machines to allow us to do that investigation. It's unique, because we have both the neuroscience expertise and the engineering skills to design and develop specialized imaging systems for this application. Most researchers tend to use commercial systems which are very limited in terms of what they can actually do. The technology development goes hand in hand with the science and we use the two to stimulate each other. A lot of people have tried to look at neurovascular coupling in vitro, where they look at small pieces of the system, but we're talking about [investigating] a working brain with all the neuronal connections and blood vessel system that needs to have blood flowing through it...To understand that system in its entirety, you really need to image it in an intact brain, but imaging an intact brain is very difficult because you have to actually get to the brain...So it's a massive technical challenge to build imaging devices that can see all of this in enough detail to really be able to understand how it's working in real time.
We're trying to rapidly incorporate new technologies such as faster cameras, faster scanning techniques for laser imaging, better lasers, more sensitive detectors—all these things need to be rapidly adopted and incorporated into the systems to make them able to image faster and image deeper with more sensitivity and contrast. We're also layering on the complexity, for example a lot of conventional microscopes only have two channels so they can see two colors, e.g. red and green, whereas our system has red, green and blue channels and it has room to incorporate even more. So where most people can look at two types of cell at once, we can look at four or five different components of the system all at once evolving in the same field of view very, very fast. We also mix together different technologies and translate techniques between different applications. For example, one of the methods that we have developed for 3D brain imaging, we are now also applying to image skin cancer. We have to overcome a lot of engineering challenges to extract information from living tissues.
Q. Are we still in the early stages of optical imaging?
It's difficult to define because optical imaging is so broad. It's not like MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) where everyone knows what an MRI machine looks like. Optical encompasses all kinds of different things, from a standard microscope to spectroscopy systems that measure samples. If you look, there's optical everywhere: Endoscopy is an optical technique, laparoscopy, eye exams, lots of things that image skin cancer are optical. The biggest challenge is to be able to see deeper into tissues with optical methods.
I went from doing brain studies as an undergraduate to my Ph.D. work where we were looking at developing a system to image the premature infant brain, looking for ways to prevent cerebral palsy. It was primarily during my post-doc when I was at Massachusetts General working in the Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging that I started to really focus on it. Researchers there were some of the pioneers of functional MRI, and I was immersed in it there for several years and that's what drew me to this question...I realized that by using these high-resolution imaging technologies we can actually see the interactions, we could actually see the single cells. I came to this idea that if we can do enough engineering, we could capture it in action. I'm a bit fixated on this now.
Q. What other projects are you working on?
In addition to applying our brain imaging tools to skin and cardiac tissues, my lab is also developing optical imaging tools for molecular imaging. Our paper in Nature Photonics last year demonstrated a new technique for imaging small animals that exploits the spatiotemporal evolution of fluorescent signals after a bolus injection of dye. This method has been licensed by a company and is now commercially available for researchers and companies doing drug development and disease research. Overall, the theme of my lab is to use engineering to extract as much information as possible from living tissues.
